Book a Consultation
  1. Home
  2. Family Law
  3. Financial Agreements
Family Law / Melbourne

Binding Financial Agreements in Melbourne

A financial agreement lets the two of you decide the financial outcome instead of leaving it to a court. It only works if it is done properly, and the requirements are strict. An agreement that fails them is not a weaker agreement, it is no agreement at all.

Financial agreements in Victoria

Certainty, bought with compliance

A binding financial agreement is a contract about the financial consequences of a relationship ending. Made properly, it replaces the assessment a court would otherwise carry out, which is what makes it valuable to anyone who wants to know the answer in advance rather than discover it later.

Agreements can be made before a marriage, during it, or after it ends, and there are equivalent provisions for de facto couples. Whichever window you are in, the document is only binding if a set of formal requirements has been met.

We draft and review agreements for clients with businesses, trusts, inherited wealth and second relationships, in Melbourne and Dandenong.

Family law at Pentana Stanton

Before marriage

What most people mean by a prenup, made under s 90B.

During a relationship

Made under s 90C, often when a business or an inheritance arrives.

After separation

Made under s 90D, as an alternative to consent orders.

De facto couples

The same structure under ss 90UB, 90UC and 90UD.

Reviewing an agreement

Whether an existing agreement still does what you think it does.

Business & trust assets

Where the point of the agreement is to keep a structure intact.

The mechanism

What actually makes an agreement binding

The requirements are in s 90G for married couples and s 90UJ for de facto couples. In substance: the agreement must be signed by all parties, and before signing, each party must have received independent legal advice from a legal practitioner about the effect of the agreement on that party's rights and about its advantages and disadvantages. Each party must also have a signed statement from the practitioner who advised them, confirming that the advice was given.

These are not formalities attached to the agreement. They are the agreement's authority.

It is worth being clear about what independent means. One practitioner cannot advise both parties. Each side needs their own lawyer, giving advice to them alone, on the document as it stands. A single adviser who drafted the agreement and then explained it to both people has not produced a binding agreement.

Advice on both sides

Each party, separately advised, before signing, about the effect on their own rights and about the advantages and disadvantages to them. Not a briefing on what the document says.

The signed statement

Each party's practitioner signs a statement confirming the advice was given. It is the evidence that the requirement was met, which is why it is the first thing anyone attacking the agreement looks for.

Signed by everyone

Straightforward, and still a source of failure where an agreement is signed in counterparts, signed by the wrong entity, or amended after one party signed.

The part most people get backwards

Your agreement is only as strong as their advice

If you are the party who wants the agreement, your instinct may be to keep the other side's involvement minimal: move quickly, present the document late, discourage them from spending money on lawyers. Every one of those instincts weakens the document you are paying for.

The person most exposed by a poorly advised counterparty is the person who wanted the agreement.

An agreement signed by someone who was rushed, under-advised or pressured is the agreement most likely to be challenged, and the challenge is usually aimed at the circumstances of signing rather than the terms. Giving the other party time, a genuine opportunity to negotiate, and their own properly instructed lawyer is not a concession. It is the difference between a document that holds and a document that produces litigation at exactly the moment you were trying to avoid it.

Agreements can still be set aside for reasons beyond the formal requirements. We cover the grounds separately in when and how agreements get set aside.

How we work

Drafted to survive being tested

i.

Establish what it has to do

Ring-fencing a business, protecting an inheritance, providing for children of a first marriage, or simply removing uncertainty. The purpose drives the drafting, and a document that tries to do everything usually does none of it cleanly.

ii.

Draft against the attack

We draft assuming the agreement will one day be read by someone looking for a way out of it. That means proper process, contemporaneous records, realistic terms, and no reliance on the other party never taking advice.

iii.

Review it when things change

An agreement written for a couple with no children and one business does not necessarily suit them fifteen years later. Reviewing it is far cheaper than discovering its limits during a separation.

Who these are for

When certainty is worth paying for

Agreements are most valuable where the alternative is genuinely unpredictable.

Business owners

Where a separation would otherwise put a trading business into a valuation exercise, and possibly into the hands of a court, an agreement is the cleanest way to keep the business out of the argument.

Family law for business owners

Second relationships

Where each party arrives with assets, and often with children from a previous relationship, an agreement lets both sides be clear about what stays separate and what is genuinely shared.

How assets are divided

Family and inherited wealth

Where money is expected to pass down a family line rather than into a relationship, and where trusts are involved, an agreement is usually a better tool than hoping the structure will do the work.

Trusts and family law
Speak with us

An honest read on whether an agreement will hold

Initial consultations are confidential and run by senior practitioners. If you already have an agreement, bringing it in for review is usually the most useful hour you will spend on it.

Book a consultation
Three windows

When an agreement can be made

For married couples, before the marriage (s 90B), during it (s 90C), or after it has ended (s 90D). For de facto couples, the equivalents are ss 90UB, 90UC and 90UD. The window you are in changes the drafting, not the requirements for the agreement to bind.

After separation, an agreement is one of two routes to a final outcome, the other being consent orders. Which suits you depends on what is being transferred and what each party needs certainty about. See property settlement.

Limits

What an agreement cannot do

It cannot deal with parenting. Arrangements for children are not something two people can bind by contract, because the question is what serves the child rather than what the adults agreed, and that can only be answered at the time.

It also cannot make itself unchallengeable. A properly made agreement is durable, not immune, and the grounds for setting one aside exist regardless of how carefully it was drafted. See setting aside an agreement.

What our clients say

Trusted on the matters that mattered most

Pentana Stanton are definitely the best lawyers to represent you in court. I was often distressed about my matter but they always showed compassion and tried to support me in the best way possible. Penny always fought for me even though my custody dispute was a difficult one.
Sara Winter, Google review
After speaking to many law firms, I felt that getting legal help was not for me. But my view completely changed after speaking with Special Counsel Peter Wood. He was knowledgeable, generous, kind, and genuinely caring.
Tasnim Mehjabin, Google review
Highly professional, compassionate staff with a high level of knowledge and competence. Reliable, reassuring and there when you need them. Highly recommend.
Gaynor Martyn, Google review
Frequently asked

Financial agreement questions

A contract between two people about how their finances will be dealt with if their relationship ends. Made properly, it replaces the assessment a court would otherwise carry out. For married couples the provisions sit in Part VIIIA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), and there is an equivalent regime for de facto couples.
A prenup is an agreement made before marriage, which in Australia is a financial agreement under s 90B. The same framework also allows agreements during a marriage (s 90C) and after it ends (s 90D), so a prenup is one type of financial agreement rather than a separate legal creature.
Yes, and this is not optional. Before signing, each party must receive independent legal advice from a legal practitioner about the effect of the agreement on their own rights and about its advantages and disadvantages, and each must obtain a signed statement from that practitioner confirming the advice was given. One lawyer cannot advise both of you.
The requirements are in s 90G for married couples and s 90UJ for de facto couples: the agreement is signed by all parties, each party received independent legal advice before signing about the effect on their rights and the advantages and disadvantages, and each holds a signed statement from their practitioner confirming it. Miss those and the document may not bind at all.
Yes. A properly made agreement is durable but not immune, and the Act provides grounds on which a court can set one aside. Challenges frequently focus on the circumstances in which the agreement was signed rather than on its terms. We deal with this in detail on our page about when and how agreements get set aside.
No. Parenting arrangements cannot be bound by a financial agreement. The question in any parenting dispute is what serves the child at the time it arises, which is not something two adults can settle in advance by contract. A financial agreement deals with property and financial matters between the parties.
Yes, under an equivalent regime: before the relationship (s 90UB), during it (s 90UC), or after it ends (s 90UD), with the binding requirements in s 90UJ. The practical structure is the same, and so is the need for genuinely independent advice on both sides.
Yes, because an informal agreement is not binding no matter how sincerely both parties mean it. Without a properly made financial agreement or consent orders, either party can bring a claim later, and the transfers you make will not be dealt with properly for duty and tax. Agreeing is the easy part. Making the agreement final is the point.
It is worth it, for two reasons. Circumstances change: children, a business sold or started, an inheritance, a move interstate. And an agreement is measured against what a court would otherwise do, which itself changed on 10 June 2025 when the property framework was codified. An agreement drafted well before that was written against a different baseline.

Last reviewed July 2026. Section references are to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). Financial agreements for married couples sit in Part VIIIA, with an equivalent regime for de facto couples. Family law matters are dealt with by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. This page is general information, not legal advice.

Speak with our family law team

Make it properly, or do not rely on it.

Whether you are considering an agreement, negotiating one, or wondering whether the one you signed years ago still does its job, arrange a consultation and we will give you a straight answer about whether it will hold.